|
| |
|

|
|
Note: The
following statistics are difficult to comprehend and not at all
reassuring. This has caused many to hide behind hopelessness in order to
justify inaction and/or the continuation of business as usual. Whatever
the case, this is a luxury that we can no longer afford. Because of
advances in technology, everyone in the World is now at similar risk, rich
and poor alike. This leveling of the playing field confirms, for the first
time in human history, that we all have a direct stake in the
quality of everyone else's life; that is, if we expect to ensure the
continuation of our own. This externally imposed constraint verifies, once
and for all, the existence of a moral /ethical
imperative of unprecedented proportion -- one the world can ill afford to
ignore.
"I was happy and indeed honored to
receive a copy of your letter to Allan Greenspan together with its
informative supporting material. I fully endorse your argument and
congratulate you on your courage and energy in putting it forward so
forcibly and so widely. My own concerns have been in the same
direction for more than thirty years...
One aspect of your Greenspan letter
struck me forcibly - "it is actually our thought process that
is responsible for the predicament we find ourselves in." I
couldn't agree more. Unless we find the means to change our
thinking I can see little hope in solving the supreme problem of
humanity -- its impending extinction."
Alexander King
Founder of the Club
of Rome
(One of the World's preeminent think tanks)
Countdown to Chaos
|
|
uring the last century alone, the number of dead from political and
religiously contrived situations, including war, genocide, tyranny and
their aftermath, numbers upwards of 250 Million people... and this is a
conservative estimate. Prior to the twentieth century the slaughter was
similarly horrific.
You would think that over the last 6000 years humankind would have
figured out a way to stop this senseless carnage. But, obviously it hasn’t,
since it continues unabated. Even as you read this, war wages on several
continents threatening to draw humanity into an exchange of weapons of
mass destruction that will cause the prior suffering (at least in numbers)
to pale in comparison. If this were not bad enough, a new threat has now
emerged in the form of secular terrorism, a dynamic for which there is NO
immediate solution.
In addition to these liabilities, there are an endless number of other
life threatening problems that already eclipse our problem solving
capability. Equally alarming, they continue to grow in both complexity and
threat. As such, they are just further unwanted antagonists to what has
already become an impossible situation. In the interests of time, I will
reference only the most pressing of these problems. The following
information is from demographic studies commissioned by the United
Nations.
|
|
|
 |
21.5% of the world's population is currently
undernourished. This translates to 1.3 billion people, and results in
some 50 million starvation related deaths a year. 14.6 million of
these are children. |
|
|
|
 |
1.5 billion people do not have safe drinking
water. Without relief from current situation this number will swell to
4 billion by the year 2025. 3 billion people lack basic
sanitation. Disease related deaths from these antagonists remain
incalculable. |
|
|
|
 |
In the larger cities of the world 40% to 50%
of the population lives in slums. This translates to 740 million
people who are constantly being exposed to significant health risks.
Worse, this number is increasing at an alarming rate every year. |
|
|
|
 |
1.3 billion people are currently unemployed.
That constitutes 1/3 of the World's total work force. At the
current rate of job loss this number will rise to 1.5 billion by the
year 2012. That is more than 1/5 of the world's population.
All who depend upon these workers are destined to suffer accordingly.
This deprivation cannot help but further exacerbate the already serious social
unrest that exists worldwide. |
|
|
|
 |
The complexity and incurability of new
diseases is also on the rise. Part of the problem is due to the
conditions cited above; another part is due to the moral/ethical
breakdown that attends the uncontrolled proliferation of information
and its wanton disregard for long standing cultural restraints. |
For
example: Some 42 million people have HIV in the world (the precursor
to AIDS). This amounts to 1 in every 100 sexually active adults
under the age of 49. Nineteen million of these are women. More than
16,000 new cases of this infection occur daily. 5 million occurred
in 2006 alone and 2.9 million people died. By the end of 2007 some
22 million adults and children will have
died from this fatal disease. At this rate, 70 million people will
have this disease by the year 2010. AIDS has already resulted in 15
million orphans and by the year 2010 that number will swell to 25
million.
Hardest
hit are third world countries. In some areas of Africa one in
four adults are infected with the HIV virus; and Worldwide,
U.N. studies indicate that "this disease now rivals the
greatest epidemics in human history." If all this
were not bad enough, the physical debilitation that attends this
illness provides an optimum incubator for a whole host of other
diseases that are now on the increase. Since the cost for AIDS
treatment remains prohibitive, no hope for a resolution is yet in
sight.
|
|
When
you factor in the World's ever increasing population (currently at 6.6
billion... and expected to increase by approximately 20% over the next 12
years) it should be obvious that the struggle for food, water, housing,
medical care, education, employment, etc., will be fierce. Include
the rush to modernization, of "developing" countries... which
when combined account for 98 percent of the world's current annual population
growth... and the increase in energy they will use, at a time
when current usage is already adversely effecting the environment,
spells environmental catastrophe for everyone. Already, |
|
|
 |
25 million acres of forest are being
lost each year to any number of causes. At that rate, 40%
of the remaining forests on earth will disappear by the year
2050. With them, so goes the quality of the air we breath. |
|
|
|
 |
"The world’s grain harvest fell
short of consumption by 61 million tons in 2006, marking the
sixth time in the last seven years that production has failed to
satisfy demand. As a result of these shortfalls, world carryover
stocks at the end of 2006 dropped to 57 days of consumption, the
shortest buffer since the 56-day-low in 1972 that triggered a
doubling of grain prices." - Earth Policy Institute |
|
|
|
 |
Of the total land mass of the World only 60.5 % is suitable for
agriculture. Of that amount, 24.9 % has already been
significantly degraded. In effect, 29 million acres of productive land is currently being lost
annually to fundamental misuse. Deforestation, overgrazing and poor farming
practices,
all of which result in soil erosion, are high
on that list. Some 24 billion tons of topsoil is involved... topsoil that cannot be
replenished. It takes 1.2 acres of land per year to feed a varied diet
to one person. Currently there is only 0.6 of an acre available.
In 40
years, at the current rate of loss, available land for farming will be
down to 0.34 acres per person. That translates to worldwide famine. |
|
|
|
 |
90 percent of all large fish species have
disappeared from the world's oceans in the past half century due
to industrial fishing," according to the international
journal "Nature." The study, which took 10 years to
complete, paints a grim picture of the Earth's current
populations of such species as sharks, swordfish, tuna and
marlin. "I think the point here is that there is nowhere
left in the ocean that is not overfished," (Ransom
Myers, Dalhousie University). Since the sea
provides a significant amount of the world’s food this
constitutes a very serious problem. |
|
|
|
 |
Warming temperatures (Greenhouse Effect) of as
much as 3 degrees (by the year 2050) could conceivably produce ocean
level increases approaching 2 feet. If this happens,
considerable land mass will be lost to habitation. The US National
Academy of Sciences reports that "as many as one billion people,
or 20 per cent of the world's population, live on lands likely to be
inundated or dramatically changed by rising waters. Low-lying
countries in the developing world such as Egypt and Bangladesh, where
rivers are large and the deltas extensive and densely populated, will
be hardest hit. Obviously, this will worsen the global situation
all the way around. |
|
|
|
 |
In 2006 the ozone hole was the largest ever
observed, at 10.6 million square miles ... or about the surface
area of North America," (Paul Newman, Goddard Space
Center). Ozone "plays a vital role in supporting life on
Earth. Ozone in the atmosphere allow most harmful solar
radiation to be absorbed, before it can reach the Earth's
surface.; Ozone absorbs a significant portion of the ultraviolet
light known as the UV-B, which has been linked to various types
of skin cancer, cataracts and damage to the human immune system;
UV-B is also known to be harmful to some crops and some forms of
marine life. Any changes in the amount of radiation that
penetrates to the Earth's surface, as a result of the thinning
of the ozone layer, has potentially serious implications for
human health and ecological systems. |
|
|
In
addition to human/environmental problems, global stability is also being
threatened by financial system instability. As we begin our journey
into the millennium, the world is experiencing its worst recession in over
50 years. Nearly every nation that lacks the necessary resources to
meet its growing need is now financially unstable... and that
includes most countries of the world. Moody's Investor Service lists
the world's dozen most fragile banking systems as: Argentina,
Uruguay, Bolivia, Venezuela, Indonesia, Pakistan, China, Japan, Thailand,
the Philippines, South Korea and the Ukraine. But the rest are not far
behind. The United States has not gone unscathed either.
It is now the world's greatest debtor nation with an increasing trade
imbalance that is inherently self-destructive. Worse, all of this is happening at a time when there exists
no resolution to basic socio-economic system polarization.
Also, the potential for the misuse of high technology continues to
escalate worldwide, hanging like an
ominous cloud over humankind. Five
nations now possess extensive nuclear weapons capability. They include the
United States, Russia, Great Britain, France and Israel. Others that
have already demonstrated the ability to build and detonate nuclear
weapons include: China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, South Africa and
possibly Iran. The Director General of the International Atomic Energy
Administration (Mohamed El Baradei) recently indicated that between 30 and
40 nations now have sufficient expertise to achieve nuclear capability.
Many of these are both politically and economically unstable. Several,
still cling to despotic ruler ship, others to communism. Hence, the
dynamics for nuclear confrontation are still very much alive in many
quarters of the world. Even a contained exchange of these weapons would
have a catastrophic effect upon the many interdependent systems that now
constitute our modern world. As a
result, we cannot even begin to imagine the consequences that would result
from an exchange of nuclear weapons, let alone prepare for it.
Then there are bacteriological and
poison gas threats that must be factored into this equation. Both
are capable, in existing amounts, of destroying all sentient life on earth... hundreds of times over. Worse, they are easier to produce, more
easily hid, can be dispensed in any number of non-technical ways, and are
far more insidious in the way they achieve their purpose. In
the case of bacteriological weapons, they may now be genetically altered,
self-proliferating, and near impossible to defeat. Not only is this threat
unacceptable and incapable of being contained, but the maintenance and
further development of these technologies, including potential defenses
against them, drain away valuable resources that might otherwise be spent
on improving the human condition.
Finally,
a less dramatic but nonetheless insidious problem is that of pollution.
With the additional resource and energy use required to sustain the
world's growing population, enormous stress is being put on the
recuperative powers of the earth. They in turn are essential to our
survival while we attempt to find ways to limit our abuse of them... and
hence ourselves. In many cases the earth is failing to meet this
challenge. |
|
|
 |
Twenty mega-cities already have hazardous air
quality. |
|
|
|
 |
Heavy metal levels exceed safe parameters in
the drinking water of most major cities. The more common culprits are
cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury and zinc. |
|
|
|
 |
At present there are some 73,000 chemicals in
use in the world. Over 70% of these have never been tested for their
effects upon the environment and living organisms. Of that number 1200
are currently suspected of producing adverse effects upon living
organisms. Many are found throughout our food chain at unacceptably
high levels. The more dangerous include PCBs (polychlorinated
biphenyl), PAHs (polycyclic hydrocarbons) dioxins, furans, and a host
of chemical components indigenous to the manufacture of pesticides. |
|
|
|
 |
Carbon dioxide levels from growing combustion
have recently been linked to the destabilization of climatic
conditions. Therefore, as CO2 levels inevitably increase with
unchecked population growth, it would appear that our weather
patterns are destined to become more and more erratic. |
|
|
|
 |
Oil spills and the growing contamination of
our oceans already threaten aquatic resources. Since the sea
provides a significant amount of the world’s food, its pollution constitutes a
particularly serious problem. |
|
|
|
 |
Garbage disposal is another
area where the solution is totally inadequate to the
challenge being faced. Burning pollutes the atmosphere, landfills
pollute surrounding aquifers, and ocean dumping destroys the aquatic
environment. |
|
|
This
is nowhere near all of the problems we face.
There are many more and each is rapidly
growing in both scope and magnitude. So what’s going on here? Why don't
we just take stock of this situation and begin fixing them?
The Underlying Problem:
As odd as it might seem, the real culprit in this equation is our
"thought process." Because it is "infinite" in its
potential and we are "finite," it was only a matter of time
before it provided us with insights that outran our ability to control
them. Since we have failed to institute our own checks and balances, we
are now faced with a knowledge base that dwarfs our capability to
comprehend the realities it empowers. Even computers have been useless in
this respect. In fact, they have made the whole situation worse. Analyzing
information at speeds approaching 1 petaflop (1,000 trillion floating
point calculations per second) they have now pushed complexity far beyond our
ability to even ‘hope’ that we might someday understand its relevance
This has set the stage for a dependency relationship between man and
machine... one that has now degraded into our blind implementation of
their directives. Monitoring and subsequent modification of any given
result remains our last lines of human defense in this lopsided equation.
When we are forced into decision making that involves time frames that
prevent sufficient human reflection, this unholy union between man and
machine becomes undeniable.
For example: the flight time between nuclear capable protagonists is
now down to less than 4 minutes in several parts of the world. This
reduced time interval clearly precludes human intervention into this
equation. The reason should be more than obvious. The specifics are simply
too complex to comprehend and act upon in the time available to do so. As
a result, "threshold formulas" that rely upon mechanical sensors
to determine actual threat, and initiate retaliatory schemes, have already
been formulated and placed into the bowels of computer systems for
"go /no go" determinations. Unfortunately, as with everything
else human, there is a lot of room for error here. However, computers are
not concerned with the existence of potential error any more than they are
concerned with ensuring human survival. Their sole objective is to
evaluate the information they receive and compare it to the mathematical
formulation that empowers them to act. Hence, they are quite capable of
initiating nuclear war and eradicating all life on earth.
In addition to this threat, we are also faced with another that is just
as unpredictable as computers are predictable. It is called terrorism.
And, with the inability to control its proliferation in evidence
worldwide, the need for an immediate solution to long-standing cultural
problems is now undeniable. Without this solution, it is only a matter of
time before weapons of mass destruction enter into this equation along
with their use. How big of a threat does this probability constitute?
With the world’s monetary system now dependent upon hypothetical
possibility as opposed to actual reality, it would not take much for a
well-placed attack to collapse the whole thing. If that were to happen,
chaos would immediately set in. Beyond that no one knows what might
happen, except that it won’t be pretty for anyone.
In the past, force and intimidation have proved successful in
suppressing unwanted social dissent. However, with the growing
availability of high tech weaponry all this has now changed. Small groups
and even individuals are now capable of acquiring a destructive capability
that could prove catastrophic to global dynamics. And, until the world
comes to this realization and acts responsibly, we will continue to be at
direct risk from all that we forcibly disenfranchise. Hence, we better
find a way to resolve cultural disputes, in a mutually acceptable way,
before it is too late. And, while we’re at it, we need to clean up all
the rest of the mess we’ve created also.
Doing this is not going to be easy, because most people are
either oblivious or otherwise unconcerned with what is actually going
on. That's just how entrenched our patterns of activity have become, much
like a drug addict hooked on crack or heroin. But, in this case the
culprit is materialism, with its ability to temporarily placate the
emptiness of spirit that haunts our more contemplative moments. Hence,
these problems are not just going to go away. They cannot do so, until we
are able to bring our thought process back under control. If we prove
unable to do so, then our destiny will lie with the open-ended continuum
that it necessarily promotes... the manifestation of which is already
threatening our extinction. In the interim, everything will continue to
spin with ever increasing momentum out of control.
The Solution: So, where do we start to try and make the needed
difference? To begin with, we must stop placing blame in order to find a
way to work together. Difference that is disruptive to this larger
objective is clearly self-defeating. Education necessarily holds the key,
but it must have a central focus... something which it doesn’t have now.
Since our system of thought is ‘infinite’ in its potential, and we are
dependent upon it for the validation of our ‘finite’ existence, it is
more than evident that we must adopt a method of self-restraint
that can successfully contain its potential to quantify. And, this MUST be
done immediately, before we unwittingly employ one of its many ideas from
which there is no escape.
This requires us to devise a "qualitative" system of thought,
with "undeniable credibility," that is able to keep its ‘quantitative’
counterpart in check. To do this, it must center upon the importance of
the "human person" as opposed to the possibility endemic to
quantification. In other words, we need to refocus our thought process on
the importance of the finite as opposed to the infinite.
On this website I have laid out the principles and methodology by which
this ‘qualitative’ system of thought can be constructed and
implemented in the shortest possible time. I've called this approach the Eden
project for obvious reasons. What it proposes is a realistic way
to identify the integrative elements of otherwise separated conclusions ( problems)
through an in depth analysis of their interdependency within the field of
question. By so doing, this new and innovative approach to problem
solving holds out our first real hope for understanding the
comprehensive answers needed to slow this whole thing down. However, given
our current situation, it must be instituted with all haste, for time is
clearly running out.
There is little doubt that every ‘human person’ owes it to
themselves and those they love, as well as those who are yet to become
important to them, to seriously consider how they can become a part of
this effort. To do less is to deny the very importance of the potential they
now defend (life itself). And make no mistake here, there is NO room for
procrastination in this equation. If we fail to achieve this objective in
the near future, there is little doubt what the outcome will be. And, no
one will escape this time around, regardless of who they are, whom they
know, or what earthly riches they possess. Given the seriousness of this threat, some real soul searching is in
order here.
|
|
Note: Use the
"back" key in your browser to return to prior text
or
Click Top to return to the beginning of
this page. |
|